<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Independent News and Politics &#187; election 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indypundit.com/tag/election-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indypundit.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:41:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Huckabee Defends Immigration Record &#8211; By Denying It</title>
		<link>http://www.indypundit.com/2008/01/16/huckabee-defends-immigration-record-by-denying-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indypundit.com/2008/01/16/huckabee-defends-immigration-record-by-denying-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indypundit.com/2008/01/16/huckabee-defends-immigration-record-by-denying-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While campaigning in South Carolina, Huckabee has found a novel approach to defending his record of open-borders and encouraging immigration.  He&#8217;s denying it.  He says his record has been &#8220;misrepresented&#8221; so he&#8217;s trying to remove any doubt that he doesn&#8217;t support amnesty because he signed a &#8220;No amnesty&#8221; plan. The video of Huckabee&#8217;s press conference [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While campaigning in South Carolina, Huckabee has found a novel approach to defending his record of open-borders and encouraging immigration.  He&#8217;s denying it.  He says his record has been &#8220;misrepresented&#8221; so he&#8217;s trying to remove any doubt that he doesn&#8217;t support amnesty because he signed a &#8220;No amnesty&#8221; plan.</p>
<p>The video of Huckabee&#8217;s press conference and signing event is available at the <a href="http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/huckabee-signs-no-amnesty-pledge-in-sc/">FoxNews</a> blogs.  It seems he&#8217;s trying to draw the fine line of being in favor of legal immigration while being hard on illegal immigration.  Will these subtle distinctions win over the nativist vote?</p>
<p>No other candidates have so far signed the pledge, so does that mean Huckabee is the border enforcer?</p>
<p>Are pledges more important than a candidates&#8217; record?  After watching Hillary&#8217;s campaign, I know politicians have no shortage of promises and pledges&#8230;but are they worth anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indypundit.com/2008/01/16/huckabee-defends-immigration-record-by-denying-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Primaries:  The Election that Wouldn&#8217;t Die</title>
		<link>http://www.indypundit.com/2008/01/10/2008-primaries-the-election-that-wouldnt-die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indypundit.com/2008/01/10/2008-primaries-the-election-that-wouldnt-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indypundit.com/2008/01/10/2008-primaries-the-election-that-wouldnt-die/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, So Iowa has spoken and we all have to pick between Huckabee and Obama, right? What? New Hampshire has their own opinion? There&#8217;s 48 OTHER states that have to vote, too? Is it just me, or has this election been going on waaaaay too long, and still have no end in sight? We&#8217;ve had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, So Iowa has spoken and we all have to pick between Huckabee and Obama, right?<br />
What?  New Hampshire has their own opinion?  <em>There&#8217;s 48 OTHER states that have to vote, too?</em></p>
<p>Is it just me, or has this election been going on waaaaay too long, and still have no end in sight?  We&#8217;ve had to deal with creationists, corporate-funded populsists, and more promises than could possibly fit on the national credit card.  The research department is informing me that there&#8217;s actually ten more months of this nonsense before we find out who gets to ruin the country next.</p>
<p>Earlier in the election, there were some interesting characters.  Two Hobbits, known as Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich, came out of fairy-tale land to tell us of the horrors of war.  There was also a friendly troll looking character named Mike Gravel, but he thought he could call out NBC&#8217;s complicity in political corruption &amp; war and still be invited to the campaign.  Silly troll.</p>
<p>Now we have the <strong><em>serious candidates</em></strong>.  There&#8217;s a Mormon who owns a major media outlet, a bass guitar-rocking Southern Baptist liberal, and a couple of charismatic Democrats who are calling for new corporate subsidies and taxes as a way of sticking it to those corporations who are getting too fat from corporate subsidies.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not even kidding about that last part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indypundit.com/2008/01/10/2008-primaries-the-election-that-wouldnt-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

